What element best ensures evidence supports the claim in a paragraph?

• A. A weak thesis.
• B. Adequate development with specific examples.
• C. Random facts.
• D. Minimal planning.

Answer: (B)

The main idea this question tests is how to make evidence truly back up a claim by pairing it with clear development and concrete examples. When evidence is supported by thoughtful development, you explain how each piece of evidence connects to the claim, turning facts into a reasoned argument rather than just a list. Specific examples matter because they show exactly how the claim plays out in real situations, data, or details, making the point tangible and easier to believe. This combination—evidence plus analysis and precise examples—helps the reader see the logical steps from claim to conclusion.

If the thesis is weak, there isn’t a strong target for the evidence to aim at, so the support feels unfocused. Random facts don’t relate to the claim and don’t demonstrate a reasoned link. Minimal planning tends to produce disorganized development, so the evidence isn’t integrated effectively and the argument loses coherence.